Before giving a bad reputation. - Page 3 - About Forum - CryptoTalk.Org Jump to content
George10

Before giving a bad reputation.

Recommended Posts

well i gave the bad reputations who just were scammers and tried to scam people and i think that is a good way to warn another members of this forum that that person is not trustable / trustworthy so i think it has its own use. but of caurse there are people who use that function for their own "way".. i dont like it, i dont do it but ... what can we do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you with everything you say. We must cooperate in all matters. We must direct the beginners to the right path for me. I do not like giving bad reputation points to anyone. They are ignorant of someone wrong and lose confidence in themselves and their participations that they write.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am fully agree with you many of members are taking revenge by giving bad reputation but now they are not doing this things and this is only done because of the contents like this are uploading regularly members are getting motivated even they realise their fault now they are taking this reputation seriously and giving only to the deserving contents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are post that we can take consideration or understandable and not giving them bad reaction but there are post that deserved a bad reaction as there are post that are intentionally posted just to earn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.I like your words mate.We all are member of this cryptotalk forum,in an another word cryptotalk family.We should encourage everyone to post more and more good post,not discourage them by bad reaction.But in case of spammers,it's different.We should report every spam post to make this family more beautiful. 

Edited by Jami273

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't stay any negative reaction for a long time. I usually report to a mod when I see a shit post, but since some countries were banned from payment I do not face such posts at all. But the next time, before to stay a negative reaction, I will follow your advice🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are right instead of giving bad reaction we should give suggestion so that  they will become a good writer but give bad reaction to the spammers make the forum clean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact, I do not like to give a bad name to anyone even if his participation is bad, first I prefer to normalize the member to the mistake he makes and to make better posts, but if I deliberately do that and repeat that, I may give him a bad reputation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a brilliant suggestion that will help us to work together more closely on this forum and improve on it drastically through team work and cooperation but all the members should try to post only useful topics that make sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dont give any bad reaction to any one or any post,the only way is if somesone talk dirty to me and i dont answer i just give a bad reaction and he stop 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is if you just message those users they will probabily not learn much and avoid your message request.

 

So better to first reputation him with bad post and then you can message him why you did that.

 

Nevertheless i don't usually give bad post reputations just because everything is accepted nowadays as spammers have been off the forum for a while.

  • Useful or interesting 1
  • +1 1

The Best Auto Faucet with levels - Highest Paying:

https://firefaucet.win/

The Best Auto Faucets with no minimum withdraw amount to ExpressCrypto!

https://autofaucet.dutchycorp.space/ | https://autofaucet.org/   |   https://autoclaim.in/   |   https://autobitco.in/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/8/2020 at 8:57 PM, MrGeany said:

well i gave the bad reputations who just were scammers and tried to scam people and i think that is a good way to warn another members of this forum that that person is not trustable / trustworthy so i think it has its own use. but of caurse there are people who use that function for their own "way".. i dont like it, i dont do it but ... what can we do?

Yes i agree with you, bad reputation must give to those account that is trying to scam other members here. We should not give bad reputation for those members that has a good post because it is not a good habit.

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I give a bad reputation to anyone, I should look their previously activities first if they are usefully or useless, so if I found their previously post are usefully, I will only warm him by message, but if their previously post also are useless I will give them bad reputation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving bad reputation doesn't mean that we hate someones post. But we are pushing them to be better and bring out the best of them when they are creating a topic or a content.

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/19/2020 at 9:31 AM, rekter said:

 

If you think that there were no reason for that mark, you could just report them, just report the message with an explanation and proof that the bad reputation was unwarranted and if the moderator agrees, the one who gave it will probably get a warning.

That's a great suggestion but I think it's better first to consult the one whom you feel has wronged you and if they repeat the same mistake again then that means only the moderators can handle them and they are worth of being reported.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some believe that they are reforming by giving a bad reputation but I think that after changing the reputation system in the forum it became better as we can choose the degree of reputation that we want and therefore not a bad reputation will be placed for one of the members only because he has a small error in one of the ideas


                                                    BetFury                                                   

    🐥Twitter | 📩Telegram | 🎲 You play - We pay 🎲 | YouTube 🍿| Reddit  🕹

                                                  Free BTC 1 800 Satoshi every day                                                 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the proplem my friend 

Here in crypto we are facing alot of 

Negative people who give bad action to their friends 

They are similar to spammers here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this is true mate, if there's some error to their posts like misunderstanding to tye topic, kindly just correcting them but if we seeing some useless topic we can give some negative or bad reputation for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the members of cryptotalk now has become a family.So if any member of this family make some mistake,it is everyone's responsibility to help him for solving that.By this way he can learn more and in future he will be able to post more and more useful posts.No one should not discourage him by using a bad reaction in these case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is true. A good or bad reputation must be presented according to the quality of the subject, and a bad reputation must not be presented randomly or unnecessarily

  • +1 1
  • +2 1

 

Life is great and enjoy it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes bro we must appreciate each other through reputation accordingly of the post and as admins now launched new payment system. I am hoping that reputation features is going to be used by everyone very wisely and accordingly of the post.

  • +1 1

NOTHING I SAY IS FINANCIAL ADVICE. YOU SHOULD USE YOUR MIND ,FOR YOUR MONEY,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi my dear.  You made a very good post.  New friends are constantly suffering from this problem.  I also suffer from this problem.  We should all explain the rules and regulations of cryptotalk.org to our new friends. If we don't do that, we will give them a bad reputation in the comments. I don't think they are right....

  • +1 1
  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very serious dude to be considered many users have been facing this problem of given bad reputation this makes the use reputations systems to be abuse. But if they will use it as you said then I don't think we shall get problem with this users.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is good if we know how,when and where we give reputation. So for me we need to be responsible and reasonable on giving reputation. Giving bad reputation doesn't mean that you didn't like the post or the topic it is for you to help other people to work more and give out the best of their selves. As well as giving good reputation it gives motivation to a person to make more useful and informative topic in this forum.

  • Useful or interesting 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yah its true that giving bad react is not good always.. First we need to do is, try to explain them About Their mistake.. If they understand then its okay but if they Won't  understand then we will give them bad reaction ofcourse.. So we need to judge first then give bad reaction... If any member think they need to give the bad reaction must becuase too much useless post then they can..                      

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Сообщения

    • 04.05.2024 Тарифы Kingex 👑   Покупка криптовалюты / Buying cryptocurrency:   BTC/ETH  +1.8% (Мы доплачиваем) USDT  +1.8% (Мы доплачиваем)   ^^SALE^^ от 50k    + 2%    Продажа криптовалюты / Selling cryptocurrency:   BTC/ETH  +3.9%  USDT   +3.9%    Оператор: @Kingex Сайт: Kingex.io Курс на протяжении дня может меняться! ------------------------ Будьте ОСТОРОЖНЫ, появились фейки! Наш телеграм: @Kingex
    • Пользователь потерял $68 миллионов (1155 WBTC) из-за подмены адреса Пылевая атака — вид мошенничества, когда злоумышленники отправляют мелкие суммы с адресов, которые похожи на адрес жертвы, обычно одинаковое начало и конец. Данная атака нацелена на невнимательных криптанов, которые копируют адрес злоумышленника, не проверяя его полностью, и отправляют на него токены. Будьте предельно внимательны при отправки криптовалюты. cryptonet.pro
    • Ник как ник. Некоторым явно деньги девать некуда. А может он в группах чем-то прославился? Не из-за истории же в 9 лет его купили. Теоретически, высоко стрельнуть могут ники с именами популярных персонажей из комиксов, культурных или политических деятелей. В остальных рядовых случаях я не представляю зачем тратить такие деньги, когда можно подставить одну букву и получить почти аналогичный ник.
    • Откуда это Горелкину-то знать? Он соавтор смежных законопроектов и зам председателя по инфо-политике, вот и отвечает словно куратор конкретной темы, а коль твёрдо надумают запрещать, если уж на то пошло, в РФ и так примут закон в течении суток после указки сверху, без рассуждений и прогнозов, и Горелкин со своим окружением послужат лишь одобрителями, послушно выполняя консультативную роль.
    • Жадный или принципиальный? Неужели присядет на нары как Аль Капоне? С такими деньгами обидно сидеть по подобным мелочам. Он, вероятно, сможет обеспечить себе безопасное и относительно комфортное пребывание в месте заключения, однако время упустит и прогремит на весь мир, что негативно скажется на попытках вести финансовую деятельность в будущем.
    • Кто-то пытается подобрать ключики, а хитрецы отправляют в банк собственную инкассаторскую машину (образно выражаясь). Может и первый по величине кражи с подделкой адреса, но явно не последний случай. Хорошо хоть таких умников в мире единицы. С другой стороны, он своими действиями показал уязвимость.
    • Любой бизнес, в том числе в сфере крипты, во многом зависит от знаний и умений человека, а также от спроса и предложений на рынке.
    • Крипто-мошенники украли 1155 биткойнов, используя технику, которая обманом заставляет пользователей совершать транзакции на подставные адреса.    По данным провайдера безопасности блокчейна CertiK , пользователь криптовалюты потерял более 69,3 миллиона долларов в обернутых биткойнах (WBTC) в результате атаки по изменению адреса 3 мая. Сначала злоумышленник создал перевод 0,05 Ethereum ( ETH ), а затем украл WBTC в следующей сделке. Блокчейн следователь ZachXBT и поставщик крипто безопасности Cyvers подтвердили эту новость. Технический директор Cyvers Меир Долев заявил, что на сегодняшний день этот случай «вероятно, является самым крупным из-за мошенничества с подделкой адресов».  В случае мошенничества с изменением адреса жертвам предоставляют аналогичный адрес кошелька и обманным путем заставляют передать активы мошеннику. Вредоносный адрес обычно имитирует четыре-шесть символов в начале и конце адреса.  Пользователи становятся жертвами этого метода, поскольку иногда трудно обнаружить различия, особенно потому, что в некоторых случаях адреса кошельков могут превышать 40 буквенно-цифровых символов.  Инцидент уже затмил доходы от эксплойтов и мошенничества за последний месяц, которые составили около $25,7 млн в цифровых активах. CertiK также отметили, что в апреле наблюдался самый низкий уровень мошенничества в Defi с 2021 года.
    • Тем более это не инвестиционная компания, они с этого не живут. Не вижу причин, с чего бы вдруг им не удерживать биткоины ещё 15 лет. А продажа их с целью компенсации понижения доходов будет свидетельствовать о корпоративной слабости.
    • Естественно. Биткоину не надо работать - над ним работают. А компании любой величины должны трудиться, оправдывая заявления о качестве и громкие торговые марки. Биткоин прямо говорит: "инвестируйте и всё у вас будет замечательно спустя 20 лет!" А компании следуют непреложному девизу: "творите, создавайте, предлагайте". Да и проще криптовалюта для миллионов простых людей в плане инвестирования. Любой бедолага из деревни способен скинуть половину аванса в биткоин через полчаса, имея смартфон, но вложиться в акции "Гугла" задача непонятная во всех смыслах. А что касается доходов Nvidia, так биткоин своим майнингом отчасти и подталкивает их. Нельзя высчитать точно процент влияния, но факт-то неоспоримый.
×
×
  • Create New...