Is there an etiquette on what situations dislike button should be used? - About Forum - CryptoTalk.Org Jump to content
rekter

Is there an etiquette on what situations dislike button should be used?

Recommended Posts

I myself haven't seen an official consensus on how exactly how people should use these.

 

Likes:

image.png.e172828dc34d1f6a175913f7ec9eb49c.png

 

It's pretty easy to justify the use of likes, everyone seems to like them and people are giving them away like a candy, and no one bats an eye if it's given for a good reason or not. Does that devalue them? I think so, as if they had value in the first place because they are just magic internet points that don't matter. Not yet anyway. 

 

Dislikes:

image.png.eb3f159e733a53bd0b33c6db711722db.png

And then there are dislikes. These act as an anti-reputation. And almost no one doesn't seem to give one for a bad post. Why is that? Is it because it's hard for us to suddenly know what determines a bad post, even though we know how to give likes to good posts? So my question is, what are they for? Punishing people for bad quality? It works only we want more quality as a group and dislike everything that doesn't contribute to forum. And people get angry if you give them. Why does giving them suddenly matter more then giving likes? We don't have to justify giving likes, so why do we need to justify dislikes?

 

Picture itself says that it can be given for a spam, but there's already report spam button so i am not sure why should be use dislikes instead of this?

image.png.086d0a8638fe8393d57c810f21700eb9.png

Edited by rekter
typo
  • Useful or interesting 16
  • +1 8
  • +2 6
  • +3 4
  • +4 5
  • +5 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think giving a bad reputation we can base it to our knowledge or it can be subjective. If we know he/she giving wrong information or his or her opinion is definitely far from the topic i think we can give the bad reputation. 

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +1 3
  • +2 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When giving good or negative reputations, we must always remove our affection from the subject or the person who published the topic, and we must give the good reputation to the members who deserve it, to encourage them to always publish good topics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, rezzougali1985 said:

The using of dislike boutton is use only to express your opinion of agreement with the topic not for report and there is a boutton for the report witch is on the right of topic and its very useful because we can help moderators on their work

So, are you saying that i could use "bad post" button if i disagree with the topic? Ok, but disagreeing with someone doesn't yet mean that topic quality is bad. It's a matter of opinion.

  • Useful or interesting 5
  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, rekter said:

And then there are dislikes. These act as an anti-reputation. And almost no one doesn't seem to give one for a bad post. Why is that? Is it because it's hard for us to suddenly know what determines a bad post, even though we know how to give likes to good posts? So my question is, what are they for? Punishing people for bad quality? It works only we want more quality as a group and dislike everything that doesn't contribute to forum. And people get angry if you give them. Why does giving them suddenly matter more then giving likes? We don't have to justify giving likes, so why do we need to justify dislikes?

Actually there is no such bad post unless the post is scam or bad words and also copy pasts, we usually give this for such things, to let them know that there post is against the rules, and i hope we do;t give this based on personal arguments and misunderstanding, i see members give sad reactions for posts because they don't agree with the idea, but that's not for, it should be used for only posts against the rules.

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, betelihem said:

Actually there is no such bad post unless the post is scam or bad words and also copy pasts, we usually give this for such things, to let them know that there post is against the rules, and i hope we do;t give this based on personal arguments and misunderstanding, i see members give sad reactions for posts because they don't agree with the idea, but that's not for, it should be used for only posts against the rules.

Ok, then what is it for then? If the post is against rules we can just report them in private, there's no use for "bad post" button.

 

1 hour ago, deboprotap said:

In post recation button there are two reactions one is love another is sad.If you do not agree or if you think the post is not valuable for you.Then you can use sad reaction to that post.But post reporting button is different,you can find that in upper right side corner.Only use report post if you are sure that the post is spam.

I just responded to your point before you posted. But so you wouldn't mind if i gave your post a bad post reputation just because i disagreed with it?

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +1 2
  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, rekter said:

Ok, then what is it for then? If the post is against rules we can just report them in private, there's no use for "bad post" button

I mentioned it on the comments, i use it for members when the violets the rules, only for teach them, i believe in second chance so some members do mistakes without knowing the rules so i sad react them then tell them that its against the rules, in this way they can change it, i use reports for scammers they don't need second chance,

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +1 1
  • +2 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, betelihem said:

I mentioned it on the comments, i use it for members when the violets the rules, only for teach them, i believe in second chance so some members do mistakes without knowing the rules so i sad react them then tell them that its against the rules, in this way they can change it, i use reports for scammers they don't need second chance,

I could just respond them that they are acting against the rules, there's no need for bad post button for that, i've done that aready numerous of times. If people don't fix their posts, i'll just report them. I tried to use bad post button long time ago with the explanations, but all that gave me was revenge dislikes.

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dislike button should be used when posting topics that are not related to the forum or the published content contains bad phrases towards a member or another topic.

  • Useful or interesting 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Report button is totally different from the reputation button.

 

Report will give a notification to the Admins / Moderators so they can check the topic theirselves.

 

On the other hand reputation system is given by the Users with their own personal opinion feedback and to reward the OPs with a good or bad incentive.

So you should use each one according with what you want to achieve.

 

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +1 1
  • +2 1

The Best Auto Faucet with levels - Highest Paying:

https://firefaucet.win/

The Best Auto Faucets with no minimum withdraw amount to ExpressCrypto!

https://autofaucet.dutchycorp.space/ | https://autofaucet.org/   |   https://autoclaim.in/   |   https://autobitco.in/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A dislike does not explain why someone gave it. It should always be accompanied by an explanation unless it is already obvious that the original post was total garbage.

 

Sometimes a like given to a post, should have an explanation as well, especially if it is given to one of the posts that are total garbage. I've given many likes, only to encourage the original poster to become better and keep writing. Sometimes the posts didn't deserve my positive reaction, but I always give reasoning on my reply. 

 

About the negative reactions I can only give them to someone that was dishonest, spamming or cheating. I can't give a negative reaction to a post that the original poster at least tried to make sense and gave an opinion, an idea, asked a question etc. I also think that dislikes shouldn't be an option on any platform. Social media and most forums don't have them for a good reason. They usually create unnecessary friction between members as it is this case as well.

 

  • Useful or interesting 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well explained, we should use both of the reactions good and bad to give reputations to each topic according to how it is. If we will read a meaningful and helpful topic we should give good reputation to encourage the topic writer. We can also give bad reputations to remind the topic write that they have write a topic with mistakes or a meaningless topic.

  • Useful or interesting 3
  • +2 1

Time is the ultimate weapon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's little bit between reporting people and giving dislike to the post ,i never give a dislike only if i have some dirty words ,but in general dislike is fr the post and not for the person 

  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think everyone knows very well where to use the like button but many of them are using it for purposeless or you can say for taking revenge from any person but now peoples are knowing the value of likes and they are giving only the deserving post that's very appreciating and I think giving appreciation to the post that are really valuable.

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Zaino34 said:

When giving good or negative reputations, we must always remove our affection from the subject or the person who published the topic, and we must give the good reputation to the members who deserve it, to encourage them to always publish good topics.

Well, this is actually true mate because many members here are just abusing this reputation by creating a topic about from it, they're saying that give them some reputations because it's free even though their topic is useless.

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the topic or posts that we do not like, we are free to give bad reputation but we have to very careful before giving such sort of reputations. If the post or topic is not deserving the bad reputation, it will make us the perfect candidate to receive warning points. 

  • Useful or interesting 1
  • +2 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, marchal87 said:

The dislike button should be used when posting topics that are not related to the forum or the published content contains bad phrases towards a member or another topic.

But wouldn't this be a job for a report button instead?

 

7 hours ago, Whited35 said:

If the topic or posts that we do not like, we are free to give bad reputation 

18 hours ago, DreamStage said:

On the other hand reputation system is given by the Users with their own personal opinion feedback and to reward the OPs with a good or bad incentive.

@Whited35, @DreamStage, so do you think that it's purely matter of taste if we want to give dislikes or not? This brings me to another question: Is there a thing like "unjustified dislike" or should all of them (likes and dislikes) to be accepted as equally valid, without a a need to explain the reasoning why we are giving them?

  • Useful or interesting 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is easier to give a positive reputation to any topic than to give a negative reputation, because you should not give a negative reputation unless you are sure that this topic is bad and can be classified as spam and you must give an explanation that justifies giving you this bad reputation

  • Useful or interesting 1
  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, rekter said:

I could just respond them that they are acting against the rules, there's no need for bad post button for that, i've done that aready numerous of times. If people don't fix their posts, i'll just report them. I tried to use bad post button long time ago with the explanations, but all that gave me was revenge dislikes.

Yeah, is obvious that members will  revenge after you report them even when you give sad reaction to them then they will give sad reaction also as a revenge, i get sad reaction for telling some one that his post was already created and let him know that if moderates found that i will get warning points and he sad react me,hos funny is that.      

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is pretty clear my friend. I have seen a lot of comments getting dislikes like "Thanks" or "You are welcome". These comments are considered spam.

  • Useful or interesting 1
  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very bad that we use emotion inside the forum because there are many troublesome people who deserve a bad reputation and if we do not warn them and give them this reputation they will continue to annoy other members and they will write a large number of random posts and we must focus on giving good reputation points to all useful posts

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These various option can be define as different choices we made  on comments where an expert sees your comment as a spammer and scale your comment.On other hand  new comers like your  comments because they understand it and find simple for them.The developer made these options for us to use them carefully if we miss use them its our wrong deed where the developer can't be blame .We need maturity here so can make valid choices .

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here on this forum mostly members use only like button. If someone find the post is useful then he gives good reputation and if he found post is not good he didn't give bad reputation. Members give bad reputation at that time when they found post is spam or useless.

  • Useful or interesting 1
  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I always use the power of my reaction according to the subject I do not fix who uploaded it only I see that if the subject is good I react in a positive way and if in useless quite the opposite 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every person have different perspective and every person differ on how they assess a post if it is need to be given a like or a bad reputation. But you are right why other people should give a equivalent rating if it is a bad post we should give it an bad reputation for the people will improve themselves more to create a good content. As well as in giving good reputation this will give the people to constantly create a good and useful post.

  • Useful or interesting 2
  • +2 1
  • +3 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Сообщения

    • Внедрили новую функцию — сканер QR-кода для быстрого и безопасного ввода адресов кошельков. Эта функция упрощает транзакции, позволяя пользователям сканировать QR-коды с мобильных устройств или изображений для мгновенного заполнения адреса кошелька. Больше нет необходимости вручную вводить длинные адреса, что снижает риск ошибок и ускоряет обмен. Для использования сканера кликните на иконку в поле ввода кошелька. Мы стремимся улучшать наш сервис, делая процесс обмена удобнее и безопаснее. Надеемся, вы оцените нововведения. *Проверяйте надежность сканируемых QR-кодов.С уважением,Команда Hinadex
    • Кошелек, который бездействовал более 10 лет, проснулся и перевел все 687 BTC ($43.9 млн) на другой адрес.  Пользователь (https://blockstream.info/address/15WZNLACuvcDrrBL2btDErJggnaMQtHh5G) купил монеты 12 января 2014 года, когда цена составляла $917 за 1 BTC. _____________________________________________________________________    1 750 000 Bitcoin - кошельков остаются неактивными более 10 лет — они суммарно содержат 1 798 681 BTC стоимостью $120 млрд. Некоторые кошельки периодически просыпаются и переводят монеты на другие адреса или на биржи.
    • Спрос на биткоин активно растет Цена биткоина в значительной степени зависит от институционалов, и рынок внимательно наблюдает за их активностью. В прошлую пятницу впервые был зафиксирован чистый приток средств в Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) в размере $63 млн.   Запуск спотовых биржевых биткоин-ETF стал мощным толчком к росту криптовалюты. Это видно по индикатору чистой нереализованной прибыли/убытков (NUPL), который в настоящее время превышает значение 0,5. Это свидетельствует о фазе эйфории на рынке. Поскольку халвинг BTC считается бычьим событием, спрос на актив, как правило, растет вслед за сокращением вознаграждения за новые добытые блоки. Во время последнего бычьего цикла в 2020-2021 годах стадия эйфории была достигнута через восемь месяцев после халвинга. С другой стороны, в этот раз то же самое произошло почти за шесть месяцев до халвинга.   Таким образом, если ETF будут постоянно стимулировать спрос, восстановление может ускориться.   Взято из источника - https://ru.beincrypto.com/btc-dlya-vosstanovleniya/
    • Биткойн-кит, бездействующий более 10 лет, переместил 687 BTC на сумму 43 миллиона долларов.   Согласно данным Lookonchain, 12 января 2014 года кит получил 687,33 биткойна ( BTC ) на сумму около 630 000 долларов США на тот момент, когда цена BTC составляла 917 долларов США.   Десять лет спустя стоимость Биткойна выросла почти в 70 раз, исходя из текущей цены, по которой пользователь продал его, за более чем 42,7 миллиона долларов. В апреле крупные инвесторы, контролирующие не менее 0,1% от общего объема поставок биткойнов, приобрели 19 760 BTC на общую сумму $1,2 млрд при средней цене покупки $62 500. Накопление средств на этих адресах зачастую предшествовало росту цены первой криптовалюты. Биткойн-киты приобрели активы за два дня до халвинга . Кроме того, в Sentiment заявили, что с начала 2024 года биткойн- киты накопили дополнительно 266 000 BTC на сумму 17,3 миллиарда долларов. Владельцы активов с балансами от 1000 BTC до 10 000 BTC получили 1,24% от общего объема поставок в 21 миллион BTC за указанный период.
    • Еженедельная производительность/Отчеты о ценах   Найдите больше на нашей специальной странице: easybit.com/ru/live-prices 👈   Обменивайте быстро и легко: easybit.com/ru 👈  
    • Weekly Performance/Price Reports   Find more on our dedicated page: easybit.com/live-prices 👈   Exchange fast and easy: easybit.com 👈  
    • Мы ценим каждого клиента и придаем особое внимание к его потребностям, что делает процесс обмена валюты у нас максимально удобным и безопасным. Приходите к нам и убедитесь в качестве нашего обслуживания!
    • CryptoExchanger на рынке уже 2.5 года, и это говорит о его надёжности и стабильности. У нас безупречная репутация и мы ответственно выполняем свои обязательства. Мы постоянно развиваем и совершенствуем наш сервис, ориентируясь на потребности и ожидания пользователей, дружелюбно общаемся и отвечаем на любые вопросы, как итог - доверие множества клиентов. Контакты: @crex_admin support@cryptoexchanger.org cryptoexchanger.org
    • Vodafone планирует интегрировать криптокошельки с SIM-картами   Телекоммуникационная компания Vodafone планирует интегрировать технологию блокчейн в смартфоны с помощью криптовалютных кошельков с SIM-картами. Реализовать эту инициативу предстоит зарегистрированной в Индии компании Vodafone Idea Ltd., 45% акций которой принадлежат Vodafone Group.   К 2030 году мы ожидаем, что в эксплуатации будет более 20 миллиардов мобильных телефонов, многие из которых будут смартфонами… По этой причине мы сосредоточились на привязке сим-карты к цифровой идентификации, к блокчейнам и использовании криптографии, – рассказал руководитель блокчейн-проектов Vodafone Дэвид Палмер.   Обозначенные цифры предполагают, что к 2030 году будет использоваться около восьми миллиардов смартфонов, а число криптокошельков увеличится до 5,6 миллиардов. Ранее в телекоммуникационной компании уже предпринимали попытки объединить технологию сотовых телефонов с блокчейном. В 2019 году американский стартап VaultTel объявил о планах по созданию кошелька, который можно было бы вставить в слот для SIM-карты смартфона.
    • Добрый день!Напоминаем,что у нас Вы можете обменять VET-BAT по выгодному курсу!Rebex.io – Ваша инновационная платформа для обмена криптовалюты!
×
×
  • Create New...