True definition of cryptotalk members

[Alice21 414]

Friend you are right in this that you say that we should continue valuing or giving reactions to other people because that is how you decide, valuations are a very important role because that is what drives people or motivates them to continue doing topics or publications.

[Marywooker 107]

Nothing drives me to give a good reputation to a topic that is bad or not useful to me, we should not encourage others to write things that do not contain useful information about digital currencies or the crypto world, and in return I do not want anyone to rate my posts positively if they do not like these posts on us We all set aside the profit and work sincerely to help the growth of this forum and the achievement of its purpose

[Zackadam 0]

Cryptotalk members are really very nice people and I am very happy to work with them. I thinks that in cryptotalk most of the members are students because they need more money.

[Moon87 798]

My dear, most of the members were aiming to collect money, not like the other members ’goal, which along with earning money was to gain knowledge and culture as well as follow the organization and the rules. 

[Kristaal 817]

It's good advice when you saying we have to support the good posts with positive reputation , but bad advice to give bad reputation for meaningless topics as you said , and who can determine the bad topics better than the moderators , because if you looked to this meaningless topics you going to find a great amount of useful replays .

[kheder333 95]

I agree with you, my friend, we are facing a problem in this matter, but I am sure that the officials will solve it. Some people here do not treat the evaluation topic as something for inspiration or appreciation for us for the effort of the member that we are doing  Rate it and this is a pity 

[Hasan1997 530]

Hello my friend, In fact, I totally agree with you that we should not have a monopoly on reputation points for topics that may interest or benefit us. In my opinion, positive reputation points should be given to any useful publication that we read in appreciation of its author's work, and the same is true with useless publications to help officials distinguish between useful publications from their opposite, but I exclude our new colleagues and I think that it is our duty to give them the opportunity to develop and work hard here in the talk of coding from In order to promote the forum and contribute to its continuation.

[Marrymartin99 33]

Yes you told us the true definition of good member. If any one do their job with honestly and make good and usefull content and his aim is not only the earn money so he is a good member of this forum.

[Abeera 755]

Dear we are Crypto talk member and we should try our best to become a good member and by doing our work with honesty we can become a good number and I also agree with you the main problems that we are not receiving reputation so we should think about it.