Giving reactions just to complete the maximum of 50? - Page 2 - For Beginners - CryptoTalk.Org Jump to content
Moontong

Giving reactions just to complete the maximum of 50?

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Mcd0d0 said:

Well, this is the one of the cons of having a payment for being paid by giving some reactions here in this forum because many people can abuse it but we cannot considered it as a abuse if they're giving a reputation in a good post.

As long as all the members giving the proper reputation to those who really deserves it then there's no problem on that. Just don't play it and don't give random reputation without reading the content. 

  • +1 2
  • +2 1
  • +3 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Dark_Sky said:

 don't give random reputation without reading the content. 

Well, this is true mate, and also don't give some positive rates for those member's who are posting some low quality or useless post because moderators are always seeing that and we can call this as a abusive way of earning TALK.

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving good reputation point without reading contents of people is not go but Always we should give positive reputation which is deserve, because I think we acquire some knowledge by reading post before we give reaction 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving all 50 reactions to get double of our earnings is not good. I think the moderators are working very strict on this issue and that is why many members are asking why their amount have not been doubled while they have completed 50 reactions per day.

  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you see me given a positive reputation to someone in the forum it depends on the value, quality and usefulness of his contents or posts. My highest reputations goes to topic writers considering the expression under the topic it attracted me most to give the highest like. While the rest goes to loyal members comments that I found worthy and deserve to be given

  • +3 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/1/2020 at 5:04 AM, rekter said:

I think that those people who give good reputation to crappy content will get kicked out eventually. Admins will see who gave those points and i am betting they don't like freeloaders very much when it comes to such important thing as quality content.

That's why we need to give reputation properly and don't play on it because we really need to give rates according to their content quality. Let's give the proper reputation that a member really deserves. 

  • +1 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely this is an important point we must always read any content and give it what it deserves from reputation points if it deserves it, whether a negative or positive reputation and not give any reputation at random

  • +1 1
  • +2 1

YOUengine-cryptotalk.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Zaino34 said:

Surely this is an important point we must always read any content and give it what it deserves from reputation points if it deserves it, whether a negative or positive reputation and not give any reputation at random

Thats true, we shouldngive the content a fair reputation, if it seems like not useful and they are just throlling the forum then they deserve negative reputation but if you feel that the post is useful then give him or her positive reputation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/31/2020 at 12:26 PM, Moontong said:

Hello guys, do you read first the content before you give a reputation or not? I have seen some good reaction even for those not useful content. Are you just giving a reaction just to complete the maximum of 50 to get double paid? Please don't cheat the reputation because I have seen the announcement of the moderators that once you have created the giving of reputation then they will stop paying for it. 

 

Be fair on giving reputation, read first the content so you have the basis if you are going to give it a good or bad reaction. Let us make this forum clean. Don't just give reaction just to complete the maximum of 50 reactions.

Yeah, giving 50 rates without reading content is very bad atleast you can read a line before giving any rates. You should respect this opportunity because deu to fake rates this forum can remove this payments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not see a reason for compulsory completion of 50 ratings daily, give reactions as much as it is necessary and deserving, simple. That's what the forum and the administration likes and implemented, even I have only completed in once since the implementation. But I won't hesitate to give deserving rating to any post; positive or negative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the reason that so many of the users are trying to reach their 50 reactions per day is because of the notion of receiving double the rewards for that day, however this concept is no longer applicable in this forum. Also, I agree with you in saying that many fail to read the content of the post before they react, and this is very bad because it will result in inaccurate representations of the posts, and moderators make use of these reactions in order to determine if a post is spam or not. 

 

My idea, is to limit the number of reactions per topic, therefore people will be required to react on multiple topics rather than trying to exhaust their reactions on just a few without merit. 

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to develop our forum we should be giving good reaction in the good topic because when any one search of any subject he can choose the good answer by topics who's big number of reactions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Moontong said:

Thats true, we shouldngive the content a fair reputation, if it seems like not useful and they are just throlling the forum then they deserve negative reputation but if you feel that the post is useful then give him or her positive reputation.

We all have different point of views, perceptions and beliefs. We must know what is useful or not, if he/she deserve a rates? Make your own judgment and to every post, don't troll or spam any unnecessary rates. 

  • -1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I give reputation, not just me but everyone we give reputation. Someone gives reputation just to earn from here, again someone gives reputation judging the quality of the comment. In case of reputation, we must ensure quality in the comments and then give reaction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/31/2020 at 6:16 PM, Calvinpriva said:

I agree with you! There are many members who are giving 50 reputations just to earn more but they don't read the full topic. It's good to read and understand the topic first, without that we just risking our accounts.

I hope they read first the comment before they give react so they will choose what number of reputation they will going to give based on the content of someone's topic or comment. Avoid giving random reputation and give what they really deserve. 

  • Useful or interesting 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right, there are some members who want to earn only and do not respect the rules of the forum, so they give reputation without reading the topic in order to complete 50 reputation a day and this is a mistake in my opinion, and it may expose his account to the ban if he continues to violate forum rules for a long time

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the comments and give the response according to the comment, but there is an order that you cannot give the same person more than one reaction even though most of these people's comments deserve a good reaction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very well said that we should give that type of reputation that a post is entitled off. It will be unfair if someone got negative reputation instead of making good post and also the ones who don't care of the forum should be given negative reputation and should be reported. As a crypto talker we have some duties towards the platform. 

  • +1 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, mhmd7 said:

but there is an order that you cannot give the same person more than one reaction even though most of these people's comments deserve a good reaction

It all depends. If you find a post that is worth your reaction then go ahead and give it. Noone will judge you for that, but certain patterns of giving too much reputation to someone in a short time would look suspicious.

  • +1 1

signature.png.b6237073b3fce6a030cb1a03993916df.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BTC Future said:

It all depends. If you find a post that is worth your reaction then go ahead and give it. No one will judge you for that, but certain patterns of giving too much reputation to someone in a short time would look suspicious.

Just make a fair giving of reputation, don't cheat this kind of feature, you don't need to give good reputation without reading the content jut to complete the 50 posts, its better if you read first the content and if it looks like useful then give them good reaction, vice versa if this is not useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/31/2020 at 12:11 PM, Moontong said:

Hello guys, do you read first the content before you give a reputation or not? I have seen some good reaction even for those not useful content. Are you just giving a reaction just to complete the maximum of 50 to get double paid? Please don't cheat the reputation because I have seen the announcement of the moderators that once you have created the giving of reputation then they will stop paying for it. 

 

Be fair on giving reputation, read first the content so you have the basis if you are going to give it a good or bad reaction. Let us make this forum clean. Don't just give reaction just to complete the maximum of 50 reactions.

I agree with you. Actually people are just like to grab talk token within minimal time. And to be honest they indirectly promote the use less contents , unknowingly. Which is absolutely bad for us and bad for the platform. So we should give our reaction after reading , we should give reaction fairly too . Only 10-12 second or little more to read the post.


1870890098_YOUengine-cryptotalk(1).png.216fca203478282b5be76ccaf6104892.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have perused it on the declaration of the mediators previously, when you have finished the 50 notorieties then it would get twofold, not your posts but rather the notorieties that you have. We are paid by giving notoriety and it will get twofold once we finished the 50 responses.

  • +2 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Jansen said:

have perused it on the declaration of the mediators previously, when you have finished the 50 notorieties then it would get twofold, not your posts but rather the notorieties that you have. We are paid by giving notoriety and it will get twofold once we finished the 50 responses.

That's true, that is why most of the people here don't even read the content and they are just giving reaction without reading just to complete the maximum of 50 reputations in a short period of time, thankfully we have here the limitation of giving reputation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, JohanDonne said:

Off Course the users usually do this but the best part is there are many people that are good and keep doing things for good purpose and you will always see them.

Because it is easy way to give a rates. Actually everyone do this kind kg thing, spamming rates when they post started to reach 20. Because its so tempting to have a 20/50 a day, 20 post and 50 rates. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Сообщения

    • A very good acquaintance with me, exchanging information and experiences in the field of cryptocurrencies
    • This trend has been going on for quite a few months now. I have been silent about this for a while, but I feel like I have to speak out about it now.   I am talking about the prevalent inactivity on the newer topics compared to older ones. How come barely a few members post on new topics compared to older ones? If you don't believe me, here is proof:   This trend is not limited to that particular section in those pictures. Just about every other section in the English forum suffers from the same fate.   If members are worrying about new topics getting deleted, new topics are generally safe a week after being created, but even those don't have as much comment as one would expect.   There is also the advice of how to pick good topics, new or old, to post on, as many senior members have admonished over the course of the life of this forum.   I am not forcing everyone to post more on new topics, but members should at least consider giving them a bit of attention. This especially holds true for members who post large volumes of content daily. Posting on older but relevant topics is okay, but you run the risk of merely repeating the idea of someone else (technically not against rules if not copy/pasted, but reading the same idea over and over is going to be a bore), or rehashing what you've just said if you already posted on it over and over and over again (a mod might call you out with spamming violation for this).   And if you guys complain repeatedly about the forum's lack of new posts but then ignore the new posts created, then please stop complaining.  
    • making analysis does not mean being able to predict the future, analysis always has two possibilities, and with that possibility we can make the right decision, stop loss is one way to anticipate, and averaging up is another way to sell it, whereas risk management is the basis for determining stop loss and averaging up / averaging down.
    • COLOMBIA, is being one of the main players in the world of cryptocurrency, due to the adoption it is having. Colombia is my country and it is the third country with the largest number of cryptocurrency users. Due to a study carried out by Statista, it reflected that Colombians have a significant interest in cryptocurrencies. Taking into account that the countries with the highest cryptocurrency users are: 1. Turkey. 2. Brazil. 3. COLOMBIA.   4. Argentina. 5. South Africa. One of the most relevant things is that the Latin American countries is the region with the largest number of users in the world of cryptocurrency. 87% of the people of Colombia are aware of cryptocurrencies and 80% are willing to invest in cryptocurrencies. There are 10 best Bitcoin cities in the world and the capital of Colombia, Bogotá, was in seventh place, thanks to its 87 businesses that are related to cryptocurrencies. My country is showing great progress and that makes me happy. Cryptocurrency allows a country to grow and innovate.
    • Ответы предоставлял-видимо вы слишком заняты или не так поняли-даже конкректную модель указал.ну а насчет критики-какая тут критика,когда мне не нравится продукт?Вы хлебушко какой предпочитаете?Черный или белый?у вот тут тоже самое-все хвалят -ахают охаю,ну думал там писец просто  а не кошелек-по ходу сам еще монеты копает-скачал.поставил,погонял месяц-не,ну ниче там такого лично я не нашел чтобы расхваливать-значит причина в другом,кто так расхваливает-и сомнения появляются,а не заплатили ли за отзыв-темы пролистал-и точно!За отзыв на плей маркете платят-ребята ну так же нечестно))Об чем с вами вообще говорить-когда вы так поступаете?Ну сделайте гавно-проведите такой же дроп-и в отзывах такие же будут отклики-ах как все чудно и хорошо-суть не меняет,всего хорошего-не вижу смысла обсуждать-каждый всё равно остался при своем мнении.
    • Certainly, the governments and Masonic organizations are fighting Bitcoin with all available means in order to topple me with a system of Bitcoin through fraud and theft.
    • Maybe this would give more work to the admins but it would be a better option as it would only have selected topics, it is a good idea.
    • I usually practice the holding mode, but I usually buy coins that are listed in the binance that have a low volume and an excellent project, so I just buy and wait for the currency to appreciate
    • In fact it can be worth it if the profit is guaranteed, it is good for beginners who don't know much about the market or for people who don't have time to look at the chart
    • Many desperate people end up selling bitcoin when it is dropping in price when in fact it is time to buy, and end up leaving at a loss because of it
×
×
  • Create New...