Showing results for tags 'doubts'. - CryptoTalk.Org Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'doubts'.

The search index is currently processing. Current results may not be complete.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Crypto
    • About Forum
    • For Beginners
    • Chia Mining
    • Crypto World
    • Coins / Tokens Talk
    • NFTs & collections
    • Bounties
    • Exchanges
    • Defi
    • Trading
    • Marketplace
    • ICO/IEO's
    • Mobile Apps
    • Wallets
    • Tutorials
    • Mining
    • Services
    • Jobs
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Referral Links
    • Gambling/HYIP's/FreeCoins
    • Off Topic
  • Russian
    • О Форуме
    • Новички
    • Chia Майнинг
    • Крипто Мир
    • Монеты / Токены
    • NFT & коллекции
    • Баунти кампании
    • Биржи криптовалют
    • Обменники
    • Defi
    • Трейдинг
    • ICO/IEO's
    • Мобильные Приложения
    • Кошельки
    • Инструкции
    • Майнинг
    • Услуги
    • Работа
    • Искусственный интеллект (ИИ)
    • Игры / Хайпы / Краны
    • Купить / Продать
    • Реферальный раздел
    • Оффтопик

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About Me


BTC


ETH

Found 2 results

  1. I think that the ignorant never ask, never question intelligently... ... Because they doesn't study. Those Who Have The Most Doubts Are Always Those Who Study The Most. I was recently reading the responses on my Topic and basically there are two answers that are constantly repeated: Fear of having your* created Topic erased They* think that the Topic should be done with complex topics and possess advanced knowledge. *Users Opinion, point 1. - Really what happens is that it does not comply with the rules of the forum read them and I assure you your elimination percentage will decrease. In general, the reasons why they eliminate Topic the most are the repetitive themes, for which you can use this topic on how not to repeat themes,link. Opinion, point 2.- Always think of simple topics, but read or study before asking. Many users do not understand that a forum is more a place to ask for help and clarify doubts, than to come and read concepts, on the contrary the concepts are questioned in forums, projects, ideas. Don't be afraid post
  2. Please read this topic before reading first : New payment and rating system for the forum. Next: FAQ new payment and rating system. This is "unofficial" opinion and should be debated by the community. You can find the links at the end of this post. How to use? no! You and only you must decide how to deliver the qualification and reputation points. This post tries to understand the difference between giving rating and giving reputation. Let us begin: A user giving his first rating / reputation of the day. Scenarios. It doesn't matter if you give a rating value between 1 and 5, reputation is one (1). 1.- e.g.(Image 1) Rating 1 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 2 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 3 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 4 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 5 => Reputation 1 / get Payment It does not rating, nothing happens. It does not give reputation, the value of the post is zero, so you get paid. 2.- e.g.(Image 2) Rating 0: Reputation 0 / get Payment Does not rating. But, yes, reputation. then, you get the payment. 3.- e.g. (Image 1) Rating 0: Reputation 1 / get Payment In summary: Rating 0 : Reputation 0 / get Payment Rating 0 : Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 1 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 2 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 3 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 4 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Rating 5 => Reputation 1 / get Payment The above means that two * conditions must be given "based on the reaction" of one (several) user (s), in order for the post to obtain a payment: Zero (0) the post did not get any reaction. A value greater than 1 up to a maximum of 5. (*) The above is really a single situation for "receiving payment," a value between 0 and 5. The opposite case is obvious, but to leave the explanation, we proceed: The user who gets -1 in his post does not receive the payment, it does not matter if it is -5, that is, the rating value is a negative range that can give a user varies between -1 and -5. Consequently reputation is -1. Rating -1 => Reputation -1 / no Payment Per Post Rating -2 => Reputation -1 / no Payment Per Post Rating -3 => Reputation -1 / no Payment Per Post Rating -4 => Reputation -1 / no Payment Per Post Rating -5 => Reputation -1 / no Payment Per Post Those are the scenarios when you exercise your right with a single user, but you can do this in total only 50 times. This, which implies? Well this is obvious, but let's go into detail. Scenario 1. If you only give a value rating of one (1) to 50 users in a 24 hour period, this implies that you gave 50 points of average rating and gave 50 reputation points. (You get a double payment for your post by sending 50 votes. 10 talk)(1) Scenario 2: You vary your votes in a range that goes from 1 to 5, if you do it 50 times, you would be giving 50 reputation points, but you could give a maximum of 250 qualification points per day, at the maximum limit of giving 5 points to each user. But as this varies, you can deliver if you qualify to the maximum that there are 50 users, a value per qualification of between 50 and 250 qualification points. (1)By rating 50 users you get the bonus of 10 additional Talk per post. Scenario 3: It does not reach 50 users in votes, nothing happens. Scenario 4: Does not qualify. Nothing happens. Conjectures/doubts: From scenario 3: If you qualify for 10 users with the maximum value of 5 points, you awarded a total of 50 qualification points and 10 reputation points. You can see it under the scheme I have used: You to User A: Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User B: Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User 😄 Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User D: Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User A: Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User E: Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User F: Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User G:Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User H:Rating +5 => Reputation +1 You to User F: Rating +5 => Reputation +1 The relevant thing here is that you do not receive the additional payment. Don't confuse 50 rating with 50 reputation. Important, that's why I like to call it "vote" because you can exercise this right with 50 different users, or you can simply give your rating / reputation vote or like it, not strictly to 50 users. It may be that you get your 50 votes and are not necessarily 50 unique users. See the previous example, user A and user F repeated. At this point it is good to remind you of the rules of the forum and of this new rating. I do not want to mix things here of standards, I may put them in another post, they are really very important. But in order not to leave anything out, I recommend that you read the official posts of this new system and complement it with this: FAQ new payment and rating system https://cryptotalk.org/topic/107295-faq-new-payment-and-rating-system/ New payment and rating system for the forum https://cryptotalk.org/topic/106294-new-payment-and-rating-system-for-the-forum/page/4/?tab=comments#comment-7228359 Attached: Image 1: Example 1: You to User A: Rating 1 => Reputation 1 / get Payment Image2. Example 2. Rating 0: Reputation 0 / get Payment Image3: Example 3. Rating 0: Reputation 1 / get Payment Image 4: Mix, Rating and Reputación Like. This user (You) received 2 votes: a like and a rating of +1. User A to You: Rating 1 => Reputation 1 / get Payment User B to You: Rating 0 => Reputation 1 / get Payment A user can never do these two actions at the same time in a post.
×
×
  • Create New...